there is a difference between nadal and federer that separates them. Nadal owns clay but wins nothing else, Federer owns grass but wins the US Open and the Australian open as well, thus Nadal cannot brush off wimbledon like federer can brush off garros
it is beyond me why everybody is so ready to dismiss nadal every time a grand slam other than rg comes to mind.he is still young,he is only 22 .he has all the time in the world to grow and improve his game on other surfaces.why doesn't anybody say something about federer not being able to win roland garros so far?
just because he has stong muscles and his game relies heavily on strength doesn't necessaryly mean that he hasn't got any talent.in fact, the one thing i admire about him is the fact that he never gives up.he never admits defeat and he plays every single ball as if it was crucial to the match. after all, in my mind, this is the mentality of a winner.
talent and dedication to the game shouldn't be measured in how many grand slem titles one has won.