It is a waste of time anyway. Alan Wiley just does his best to justify the refereeing decision in each case (Johnson and Welbeck both deliberately kicking the defenders' legs. He does not have the courage to come right out and say, "Both referees were conned", but he almost says it. If Alan Wiley cannot be decisive in his opinions, then 'Whistleblower' is a waste of our time and his. Yahoo - If you cannot be honest, then pull this feature.