Liverpool Message Board
you are viewing a single comment's thread.view the rest of the posts
I've a feeling that had we had Abramovich as owner. He wouldn't be dithering..
He'd most likely see the season as a failure and would sack Commolli & Dalgish together..
Seems quite apparent this season has been a disaster.
Aside from the C. Cup..
If FSG feel KD over spent on Henderson, Carroll & Downing then how can they trust KD?
Would you honestly want Abramovich as an owner? I'm not so sure myself. Ok he's lifted Chelsea into a position where they can and have won trophies but on the face of it the future looks a bit bleak to me unless Abramovich wants to pile even more money in.
It doesn't sit right with me that the marks of Chelsea's succes are Terry, Lampard, Drogba and a few others. Yes they should be remembered and applauded but what happens as they start to decline? The management, club set up, ideals and philosophies are all lost or don't even exist.
- 2 Replies to Colyn
I'd take his money, but agree the rest of what he brings I'd rather do without. Put it this way, if Roman was our owner we'd not have discussions about whether Carroll or Henderson were good buys and should Kenny, DC or anyone else be accountable for them, because when it comes to big transfers Roman buys based on his personal whim rather than trust managers or directors of football to take responsibility.
He'd pump in more money for a start. A new stadium could on the way to being built? Better players would be here.
However we know Abramovich has an impatient streak in him, that if the manager doesn't win the title every season they're sacked..