• Liverpool Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • colin colin Mar 4, 2013 19:42 Flag

    Little message to Colin

    Loki..if u read the whole article unless Im mistaken it stated that its just as a result of the dates that the figures were reported...eg over the Xmas holiday period when there are a disproportionate amount of outgoings to be taken into account and that were the figures to be reported somewhat later as was stated the balance would as a result of incoming cash and a diminishment of outgoings be very different.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Loki the reason that I posted this stuff up about the accounts was cos i thought u guys might have been interested to the extent that it was this very matter that is so governed by FFP that u have spoken so much about and I wanted to point out... IF u had read the article carefully u self u would have seen it.... that even though it looked like we had lost money it was stated that as the next posting period came up it would reflect the reverse of this which would in essence make the picture look somewhat rosier inthe next quarters reporting...however the whole thing has turned into..yet again...Colin says" FSG ARE TAKING MONEY OUT OF THE CLUB"...something I have never actually posted up so clearly u have it in for me and not a lot I can do about it.

    • So what are you saying here Colin? Are you saying that because these accounts are out of date and don't take into account current circumstances that the club must be making a profit now, but the owners are taking much of that out for themselves, or that the owners are actually spending on the club everything the club actually brings in, or in fact like this current report, the club is actually spending more than the club is making?

      • 2 Replies to dsteer_lfc_68
      • DSTEER LOKI COLYN...please show me a single post where I have definitively stated that the owners FSG are or have been taking money out of the club ? I am on record in these posts of stating categorically that I am not in any way against the owners making a healthy profit. I am I will readily admit also on record in these posts as stating that I "dont trust FSG"....so what ? If I say I "dont trust FSG" does that then mean that in every post where I have stated that it should then automatically be also read as "FSG have taken monies out of the club'...If I say "I dont trust you." Should that automatically also be read as "You are a thief, dishonest and disreputable." of course not....I may not trust u sense of judgement..simple as that with no further necessity to read anything more into it ...let alone posting up putting words in to my mouth as this seems to be all u three can do...oh for the days of Jose Pombal and Paisley Shanks on this board where their was some real divergence of informed opinion instead of this pathetic ganging-up...dont think I will be much longer for this board doesnt seeem too much point in posting up as people will read what it is they want to read into it rather than simply reading what it is Ive actually posted up.

      • dsteer...Im not saying anything other than what was said in the article whereas Loki wants to use it as definitive proof that the owners have made nothing since buying the club and have taken nothing out since this time. All it is is the reporting of one particular financial period and what the article said is that had the report been for a couple months later it would have painted a very different picture...make what u like of it. You want people to believe we are owned by benevolent altruistic owners fine...your free to try and convince who u like of such an opinion..likewise Loki. Me I think we are owned by hard headed American Businessmen and such people will do what proves best for their own interests when such a time arrives and at that point we are just a commodity sold on to the highest bidder and look what happened when Moores sold on !...???