Formula One drivers have demanded the FIA stops treating them like children in a damning indictment of the governing body’s policies and its president, Mohammed Ben Sulayem.

The Grand Prix Drivers’ Association (GPDA), which represents F1 drivers, issued a strongly worded and highly critical statement on Thursday, addressing the recent controversy over ­swearing. It took issue with the “tone and ­language” used by Ben Sulayem and questioned the financial transparency of the FIA, in a highly unusual and very public critique which puts the FIA in a difficult position.

After Max Verstappen and Charles Leclerc were recently punished for swearing in FIA press conferences the ­feeling among the drivers was that the ­governing body was wildly over­reacting. On Thursday their scathing, united reaction was their first collective public statement since 2017 – indicative of their frustration with the FIA and Ben Sulayem.

Related: Max Verstappen’s flawless display joins F1’s very best wet-weather drives | Giles Richards

“There is a difference between swearing intended to insult others and more casual swearing, such as you might use to describe bad weather, or indeed an inanimate object such as an F1 car or a driving situation,” the statement said.

“We urge the FIA president to consider his own tone and language when talking to our member drivers, or indeed about them, whether in a public forum or otherwise. Further, our members are adults. They do not need to be given instructions by the media about matters as trivial as the wearing of jewellery or underpants.”

The latter reference is to the period when Ben Sulayem insisted on enforcing rules around jewellery and underwear, which also provoked driver displeasure and, in the case of Lewis Hamilton’s nose stud, led to a long-running standoff with the British driver.

The latest crackdown on ­swearing is believed to have come directly from Ben Sulayem, who gave an ­interview shortly before Verstappen’s ­punishment in which he said he did not want drivers to swear and stated F1 must “differentiate between our sport – motor sport – and rap music”.

The comment was caustically criticised by Hamilton immediately afterwards. “Saying ‘rappers’ is very stereotypical,” he said. “If you think about it, most rappers are black, so it says: ‘We are not like them.’ Those are the wrong choice of words and there is a racial element there.”

Verstappen was given a period of community service for his ­misdemeanour in Singapore, when he had described his car as “fucked”. He reacted to the punishment with cold fury and all but refused to speak at ­subsequent FIA press ­conferences, instead happily talking to the media afterwards. Leclerc was given a fine of €10,000 for saying: “I was like: ‘Fuck,’” in reference to being in a dicey moment on track at the Mexico City Grand Prix.

Outside racing incidents on track, which are usually punished with time or grid penalties, the most common FIA sanction is fines and the drivers are clearly also unhappy with the policy and, indeed, how this income is being managed.

“The GPDA has, on countless occasions, expressed its view that driver monetary fines are not ­appropriate for our sport,” the ­statement ­continued. “For the past three years we have called upon the FIA ­president to share the details and strategy regarding how the FIA’s financial fines are ­allocated and where the funds are spent.

“We once again request the FIA president provides financial transparency and direct, open dialogue with us. All stakeholders [FIA, F1, the teams and the GPDA] should jointly determine how and whether the money is spent for the benefit of the sport.”

All 20 F1 drivers are members of the GPDA and the chair is the ­former driver Alex Wurz. Its directors include the Mercedes driver George Russell and the former world ­champion Sebastian Vettel.

Their statement concludes with a call to work with the FIA to resolve the situation.

The FIA has been approached for comment.